π Flow Analysis
Deep dive into the flow component of Session DNA
Generated June 13, 2026 Β· 119 sessions analyzed
π‘ Key Insights
Flow varies by category (writing=62.5 vs building=74.9)
Gap of 12 points. Mixed sessions score lower because tasks from different domains share fewer title words.
26.1% of sessions hit the flow floor (β€55)
31 sessions. Dominated by: mixed (23)
U-shaped flow trajectory
Flow dipped mid-career then recovered. Likely cause: early sessions explored broadly (low flow), then built focused pipelines (high flow).
V2 flow metric shifts scores by -9.8 on average
V1 mean: 71.7, V2 mean: 61.9. Correlation: r=0.49. V2 adds category coherence and learning overlap.
π Flow Over Time
π Flow by Category
π Flow by Task Count
π Correlations with Other Components
π V2 Flow Metric
The V2 flow metric adds category coherence, learning overlap, and normalizes for task count bias.
π» Floor Sessions (β€55)
31 sessions (26.1%) hit the flow floor.
Average task count: 3.9 Β· Average satisfaction: 8.8/10
Despite low flow, these sessions had high satisfaction β proving that flow and quality are independent.