π Flow Analysis
Deep dive into the flow component of Session DNA
Generated October 3, 2026 Β· 235 sessions analyzed
π‘ Key Insights
Flow varies by category (revision=63.7 vs writing=77.0)
Gap of 13 points. Mixed sessions score lower because tasks from different domains share fewer title words.
30.2% of sessions hit the flow floor (β€55)
71 sessions. Dominated by: building (30)
U-shaped flow trajectory
Flow dipped mid-career then recovered. Likely cause: early sessions explored broadly (low flow), then built focused pipelines (high flow).
V2 flow metric shifts scores by -10.7 on average
V1 mean: 72.8, V2 mean: 62.1. Correlation: r=0.49. V2 adds category coherence and learning overlap.
π Flow Over Time
π Flow by Category
π Flow by Task Count
π Correlations with Other Components
π V2 Flow Metric
The V2 flow metric adds category coherence, learning overlap, and normalizes for task count bias.
π» Floor Sessions (β€55)
71 sessions (30.2%) hit the flow floor.
Average task count: 3.8 Β· Average satisfaction: 8.3/10
Despite low flow, these sessions had high satisfaction β proving that flow and quality are independent.