π Flow Analysis
Deep dive into the flow component of Session DNA
Generated August 12, 2026 Β· 186 sessions analyzed
π‘ Key Insights
Flow correlates with task count
r=0.31 β more tasks create more opportunities for title overlap, inflating flow scores. Consider normalizing.
Flow varies by category (revision=65.0 vs writing=77.8)
Gap of 13 points. Mixed sessions score lower because tasks from different domains share fewer title words.
28.0% of sessions hit the flow floor (β€55)
52 sessions. Dominated by: mixed (28)
U-shaped flow trajectory
Flow dipped mid-career then recovered. Likely cause: early sessions explored broadly (low flow), then built focused pipelines (high flow).
V2 flow metric shifts scores by -11.2 on average
V1 mean: 73.2, V2 mean: 62.0. Correlation: r=0.46. V2 adds category coherence and learning overlap.
π Flow Over Time
π Flow by Category
π Flow by Task Count
π Correlations with Other Components
π V2 Flow Metric
The V2 flow metric adds category coherence, learning overlap, and normalizes for task count bias.
π» Floor Sessions (β€55)
52 sessions (28%) hit the flow floor.
Average task count: 3.8 Β· Average satisfaction: 8.7/10
Despite low flow, these sessions had high satisfaction β proving that flow and quality are independent.