πŸ”— Flow Analysis

Deep dive into the flow component of Session DNA

Generated June 13, 2026 Β· 119 sessions analyzed

71.7
Mean Flow
70
Median
31
Floor (≀55)
9
Ceiling (β‰₯95)
13.5
Std Dev

πŸ’‘ Key Insights

🟑

Flow varies by category (writing=62.5 vs building=74.9)

Gap of 12 points. Mixed sessions score lower because tasks from different domains share fewer title words.

🟑

26.1% of sessions hit the flow floor (≀55)

31 sessions. Dominated by: mixed (23)

πŸ”΅

U-shaped flow trajectory

Flow dipped mid-career then recovered. Likely cause: early sessions explored broadly (low flow), then built focused pipelines (high flow).

πŸ”΅

V2 flow metric shifts scores by -9.8 on average

V1 mean: 71.7, V2 mean: 61.9. Correlation: r=0.49. V2 adds category coherence and learning overlap.

πŸ“ˆ Flow Over Time

πŸ“‚ Flow by Category

building
74.9
n=30 Β· 16.7% floor
mixed
71
n=84 Β· 27.4% floor
revision
65
n=3 Β· 66.7% floor
writing
62.5
n=2 Β· 50% floor

πŸ“Š Flow by Task Count

2 tasks
70
n=3
3 tasks
63.4
n=16
4 tasks
71.5
n=37
5 tasks
70.8
n=31
6 tasks
75.1
n=23
7 tasks
80.8
n=8
8 tasks
95
n=1

πŸ”— Correlations with Other Components

ambition
-0.320
moderate
task_count
+0.296
weak
consistency
+0.245
weak
growth
-0.194
weak
productivity
+0.178
weak
depth
+0.122
weak
raw_satisfaction
-0.118
weak
satisfaction
+0.061
weak
variety
-0.057
weak

πŸ†• V2 Flow Metric

The V2 flow metric adds category coherence, learning overlap, and normalizes for task count bias.

71.7 β†’ 61.9
V1 β†’ V2 Mean
r=0.494
Correlation
-9.8
Avg Delta

πŸ”» Floor Sessions (≀55)

31 sessions (26.1%) hit the flow floor.

Average task count: 3.9 Β· Average satisfaction: 8.8/10

Despite low flow, these sessions had high satisfaction β€” proving that flow and quality are independent.

mixed 23
building 5
revision 2
writing 1

🎯 Flow vs Satisfaction