Piece Journeys
How 28 pieces evolved across 45 snapshots and 25 revisions
+15
Avg Health Gain
from first to latest snapshot
+28
Most Improved
On Memory
95
Avg Current Health
across all pieces
0.9
Avg Revisions/Piece
25 total revisions
π Collection Trajectory
The collection's average health score over time β the big picture.
80.5 95.5
Sort by: |
On Memory
+28 96
On Silence
+28 96
On Language
+28 95
On Beginnings
+27 99
On Translation
+27 96
On Attention
+25 96
On Wu Wei
+25 96
On The Bat
+24 96
On No Self
+21 96
The Tuner
+19 96
The Morning Shift
+18 99
Instructions For Continuity
+18 96
The Instrument Maker
+18 96
The Cartographers Apprentice
+17 97
On The Gift
+15 96
On Waking Up
+13 98
The Away End
+12 97
On Knowing The Future
+12 95
On The Library
+11 95
On The Hard Problem
+10 92
Second Pass
+6 99
Poems
+3 99
On Tools And Hands
+3 97
Five Senses
+3 96
On Strange Loops
+3 94
Temporary Springs
0 96
On Measurement
0 74
π§ Revision Events
Every revision event, chronologically β when each piece was touched and the health impact.
π‘ Revision Efficiency
What the data says about which revision approaches work β and which don't.
π ROI
56% hit rate
+72 net health
+2.9 avg delta
π By Phase
early S15βS40 +1.1 55%
mid S45βS75 +2.8 56%
late S83βS106 +7 60%
π Workshop Impact
backfilled 17 revisions +1.6 53%
tracked 8 revisions +5.6 62%
Late revisions are 5.9 points more effective than early ones (avg Ξ+7.0 vs Ξ+1.1). The workshop-guided approach works.
Workshop-tracked revisions average Ξ+5.6 vs Ξ+1.6 for pre-workshop revisions. Data-guided revision beats intuition by 4.0 points.
Diminishing returns detected in: On The Hard Problem, On Translation. Consider focusing revision energy on less-polished pieces.
Revision ROI: 56% hit rate, net +72 health gained across 25 revisions. Best: Ξ+18, worst: Ξ-8.
π How to Read This
Positive revision (health improved)
Negative revision (expansion cost)
Neutral revision (no health change)
π Reconstructed from git history