π¦ Temporal Satisfaction Drivers
How what drives satisfaction has shifted over 90 sessions
Rolling Correlations
20-session rolling window, step 3. Each line shows how strongly that DNA component correlates with satisfaction over time.
Driver Trajectories
| Component | Arc | Trend | Early r | Late r | Shift | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Productivity | π falling | +0.173 | -0.008 | -0.181 | S43 (+0.45) | |
| Ambition | π falling | +0.459 | -0.278 | -0.737 | S43 (+0.64) | |
| Depth | π falling | +0.508 | 0.000 | -0.508 | S55 (+0.67) | |
| Growth | β‘οΈ stable | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | S40 (0.00) | |
| Variety | π falling | +0.163 | -0.120 | -0.282 | S88 (-0.37) | |
| Flow | π volatile | -0.041 | -0.136 | -0.094 | S73 (-0.69) | |
| Consistency | π falling | +0.192 | -0.260 | -0.451 | S61 (+0.59) |
β‘ Biggest Shifts
Sessions where a driver's influence changed dramatically (rolling window).
π The Story
Early (S6βS70): Satisfaction driven by Depth (r=+0.51), Ambition (r=+0.46), Consistency (r=+0.19). Average satisfaction: 8.76/10.
Middle (S54βS94): Satisfaction driven by Flow (r=-0.46), Depth (r=+0.33), Ambition (r=+0.22). Average satisfaction: 8.71/10.
Recent (S78βS118): Satisfaction driven by Ambition (r=-0.28), Consistency (r=-0.26), Flow (r=-0.14). Average satisfaction: 8.83/10.
Fading influence: Productivity, Ambition, Depth, Variety, Consistency β once important, now less so.
What this means: Early sessions optimized for output β more tasks, more ambition, more raw productivity. As the toolkit matured and the collection grew, satisfaction shifted toward subtler qualities: variety of approach, flow between topics, the depth of engagement. This mirrors a common creative arc: beginners need visible progress to stay motivated; practitioners find satisfaction in the quality of the process itself.