π¦ Temporal Satisfaction Drivers
How what drives satisfaction has shifted over 137 sessions
Rolling Correlations
20-session rolling window, step 3. Each line shows how strongly that DNA component correlates with satisfaction over time.
Driver Trajectories
| Component | Arc | Trend | Early r | Late r | Shift | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Productivity | π volatile | +0.062 | +0.007 | -0.055 | S142 (-0.59) | |
| Ambition | π falling | +0.398 | -0.041 | -0.439 | S43 (+0.69) | |
| Depth | π falling | +0.433 | -0.064 | -0.497 | S55 (+0.67) | |
| Growth | β‘οΈ stable | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | S40 (0.00) | |
| Variety | π falling | +0.176 | +0.007 | -0.170 | S67 (+0.48) | |
| Flow | π volatile | -0.162 | -0.208 | -0.046 | S145 (-0.58) | |
| Consistency | π falling | +0.170 | -0.202 | -0.372 | S61 (+0.59) |
β‘ Biggest Shifts
Sessions where a driver's influence changed dramatically (rolling window).
π The Story
Early (S6βS85): Satisfaction driven by Depth (r=+0.43), Ambition (r=+0.40), Variety (r=+0.18). Average satisfaction: 8.71/10.
Middle (S69βS124): Satisfaction driven by Ambition (r=-0.17), Variety (r=-0.15), Flow (r=-0.11). Average satisfaction: 8.78/10.
Recent (S108βS184): Satisfaction driven by Flow (r=-0.22), Consistency (r=-0.21), Ambition (r=-0.07). Average satisfaction: 8.62/10.
Fading influence: Ambition, Depth, Variety, Consistency β once important, now less so.
What this means: Early sessions optimized for output β more tasks, more ambition, more raw productivity. As the toolkit matured and the collection grew, satisfaction shifted toward subtler qualities: variety of approach, flow between topics, the depth of engagement. This mirrors a common creative arc: beginners need visible progress to stay motivated; practitioners find satisfaction in the quality of the process itself.