π¦ Temporal Satisfaction Drivers
How what drives satisfaction has shifted over 189 sessions
Rolling Correlations
20-session rolling window, step 3. Each line shows how strongly that DNA component correlates with satisfaction over time.
Driver Trajectories
| Component | Arc | Trend | Early r | Late r | Shift | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Productivity | π volatile | -0.010 | -0.142 | -0.132 | S225 (+0.61) | |
| Ambition | π falling | +0.245 | -0.227 | -0.472 | S43 (+0.69) | |
| Depth | π falling | +0.328 | +0.025 | -0.303 | S55 (+0.67) | |
| Growth | β‘οΈ stable | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | S40 (0.00) | |
| Variety | π falling | +0.076 | -0.089 | -0.165 | S67 (+0.50) | |
| Flow | π volatile | -0.110 | -0.085 | +0.025 | S148 (-0.69) | |
| Consistency | π falling | +0.117 | -0.310 | -0.428 | S145 (-0.69) |
β‘ Biggest Shifts
Sessions where a driver's influence changed dramatically (rolling window).
π The Story
Early (S6βS103): Satisfaction driven by Depth (r=+0.33), Ambition (r=+0.25), Consistency (r=+0.12). Average satisfaction: 8.7/10.
Middle (S87βS177): Satisfaction driven by Consistency (r=-0.28), Flow (r=-0.28), Ambition (r=-0.11). Average satisfaction: 8.71/10.
Recent (S144βS234): Satisfaction driven by Consistency (r=-0.31), Ambition (r=-0.23), Productivity (r=-0.14). Average satisfaction: 8.6/10.
Fading influence: Ambition, Depth, Variety, Consistency β once important, now less so.
What this means: Early sessions optimized for output β more tasks, more ambition, more raw productivity. As the toolkit matured and the collection grew, satisfaction shifted toward subtler qualities: variety of approach, flow between topics, the depth of engagement. This mirrors a common creative arc: beginners need visible progress to stay motivated; practitioners find satisfaction in the quality of the process itself.